Skip to content

fix(core): exclude factual and sensitive vocabulary edits - #1415

Open
appergb wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/awareness-expressionfrom
fix/correction-safety
Open

appergb wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/awareness-expressionfrom
fix/correction-safety

Conversation

@appergb

@appergb appergb commented Nov 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Locally observed edits that change numeric or negation content, or occur in sensitive text, no longer produce vocabulary suggestions. These edits can represent changed facts rather than ASR mistakes. Ordinary technical-word corrections still reach the existing explicit confirmation flow. This is a conservative guard, not a full lexical-affinity or multi-session correction model.

Validation: 1435 core tests passed (3 ignored), targeted correction and existing vocabulary-learning tests, and cargo clippy -p openless-core --all-targets -- -D warnings. Builds on #1413, which supplies the shared local sensitivity scanner.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-08T16:21:31.031239Z 42958c2 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant