Repository navigation
Conversation
Owner
|
How do you determine where to click on the horizontal slider? I don’t want anything that hardcodes the count of effort levels and the like |
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The GPT-6 model-effort picker exposes an ARIA slider with a valid range and ticks, but effort discovery can repeatedly fail with
ChatGPT did not move its effort slider toward the requested position. The previous implementation always sent ArrowLeft/Right to the ancestorrole=menuitem; the actual slider thumb can own keyboard focus and events.Change
role=sliderthumb; use the existing menu-item keyboard path for legacy/nonfocusable layouts.aria-valuenowafter each attempt, preserving range/lock checks, abort handling and fail-closed behavior. Never assign ARIA values or infer an unobserved effort.Verification
connector-cache.test.tsfails because Windows reports 0666 instead of POSIX 0600.The official production companion was not replaced. An independent native 2.3.29 capability probe did succeed, but the patched build still needs a controlled authenticated live trial before production deployment. No goal, shared tunnel, worker, or fleet schedule was modified.