Skip to content

Pin transport v0.2.0 - #2

Merged
natevick merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
natevick/repin-transport-0.2.0
Nov 9, 2026
Merged

natevick merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
natevick/repin-transport-0.2.0

Conversation

@natevick

@natevick natevick commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pins transport v0.2.0, the first tagged release with --stdio. Linear: SEL-115.

CI now builds transport and transport-conformance from the v0.2.0 commit (--rev 553bb45) instead of commit 44a9c7a. The static musl transport in the Linux platform wheel is built from the same tag. The README's build instructions match. No runtime code changes: the client takes its transport from the wheel, SELECTIVE_TRANSPORT or PATH, and never downloads it.

Verification

Check Result
Unit tests on Python 3.9, 3.12, 3.14 68 passed, 4 skipped, same as main
Conformance with the v0.2.0 harness and binary, all three versions 26 ok, 0 n/a, 0 failed. The 26th scenario, retries_after_rejected_connects, is new in v0.2.0
git grep for old pins (44a9c7a, pr10-, v0.1.) No hits

CI's wheel job builds the musl transport from the tag and runs the installed wheel's check_stdio on Alpine and Debian.

test (3.14, newest) is red because newest now resolves to pytest 9.2.0, which came out after main's last green run. main breaks the same way on 9.2.0: 14 failed, 53 passed, against 67 passed on 9.1.1. This PR changes no Python. Tracked in SEL-116.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-02T05:03:22.349003Z 2fab596 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

cargo install --tag follows a mutable ref: if v0.2.0 were moved, cold-cache runners would build different source under the same cache key. Build from the tag's commit 553bb45b8bfa3ac9c9f7ed1ad71a8ac19d384542 (git ls-remote refs/tags/v0.2.0) with --rev, and put the full SHA in the cache keys and install dirs. TRANSPORT_RELEASE keeps the release name visible. Runtime download pins are unchanged: tag v0.2.0 plus the pinned sha256.
@natevick

natevick commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: 2fab59678c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@natevick
natevick merged commit eed200f into main Nov 9, 2026
32 of 34 checks passed
@natevick
natevick deleted the natevick/repin-transport-0.2.0 branch November 9, 2026 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants